DAMAGES FOR CTM INFRINGEMENT: DOES ANYONE KNOW?


The IPKat has been pondering on a couple of difficult questions involving the multi-jurisdictional enforcement of Community trade marks (CTMs).

First, if a CTM is infringed in, say, France, Germany and Italy, and the owner sues successfully before a Community Trade Mark Court in Germany, he is entitled to ask for damages in all three countries. Is he entitled to damages based on German law for all three countries, or does he have to settle for German quantum in Germany, French quantum in France and Italian quantum in Italy? In the German Home Depot case earlier this year the trial court ordered German damages in respect of several countries, but did appear to limit its reasoning to cases where the defendant is mainly German and the bulk of the infringement takes place in Germany. However, Article 98(2) of the CTM Regulation appears to suggest that, so far as damages are concerned, the CTM Court should apply the law of each country in which infringement takes place. Art.98(2) states:
"1. Where a Community trade mark court finds that the defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe a Community trade mark, it shall, unless there are special reasons for not doing so, issue an order prohibiting the defendant from proceeding with the acts which infringed or would infringe the Community trade mark. It shall also take such measures in accordance with its national law as are aimed at ensuring that this prohibition is complied with.

2. In all other respects the Community trade mark court shall apply the law of the Member State in which the acts of infringement or threatened infringement were committed, including the private international law".
Secondly, private international law principles normally say that, in a dispute about a contract governed by (say) French law, a UK court would consider French law to be the same as UK law unless one of the sides adduced evidence to the contrary. Does the same principle apply here, to the rules relating to the assessment of damages, or does the regulation's instruction to "apply foreign law" in Art.98(2) make a difference?

If you have any bright ideas or, better still, correct and authoritative answers, can you please either post them below or email them to the IPKat here.
DAMAGES FOR CTM INFRINGEMENT: DOES ANYONE KNOW? DAMAGES FOR CTM INFRINGEMENT: DOES ANYONE KNOW? Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, August 11, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. I am about to show you a way that you can generate thousands of keyword targeted links back to your web site starting today!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I discuss this topic daily myself. I also have a website that talks about business home internet make money related things. Go check it out if you get a chance.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.