MORE REPORTED CASES

The January 2004 issue of Butterworths’ subscription-only Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has finally emerged. Apart from the House of Lords decision in Wainwright v Home Office (no right of privacy even after the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998), the issue covers the Court of Appeal decisions in Inter Lotto v Camelot (on the trade mark/passing off interface) and FA Premier League v Panini (whether logos on footballers’ shirts are “incidentally included” in photos of footballers who wear them) and lots more besides. All IP&T cases come fully equipped with comprehensive headnotes; they are available to subscribers both online and in printed form.
MORE REPORTED CASES MORE REPORTED CASES Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 06, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.